| 1 |
On Wednesday 11 June 2003 8:08 am, Alastair Tse wrote: |
| 2 |
| On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 01:02, Kurt V. Hindenburg wrote: |
| 3 |
| > Calculating dependencies / |
| 4 |
| > !!! all ebuilds that could satisfy "app-crypt/cryptplug" have |
| 5 |
| > been masked. |
| 6 |
| |
| 7 |
| Maybe because you're on a x86 profile and not ~x86? |
| 8 |
| |
| 9 |
| % fgrep KEYWORDS cryptplug-0.3.15.ebuild |
| 10 |
| KEYWORDS="~x86 ~ppc" |
| 11 |
| |
| 12 |
| AFAIK, that package.unmask only affects things in pacakge.mask, you |
| 13 |
| are still restricted by ACCEPT_KEYWORDS. |
| 14 |
| |
| 15 |
Hmmm, I'm not sure I follow...why does a search on cryptplug says it |
| 16 |
is masked? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
* app-crypt/cryptplug [ Masked ] |
| 19 |
Latest version available: 0.3.15 |
| 20 |
Latest version installed: 0.3.15 |
| 21 |
Size of downloaded files: 213 kB |
| 22 |
Homepage: http://www.gnupg.org/ |
| 23 |
Description: GPG and S/MIME encryption plugins. Use by KMail |
| 24 |
v1.5 (KDE 3.1) and Mutt |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
So package.unmask only reverses stuff in package.mask? |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Kurt |
| 32 |
--- |
| 33 |
There is no good and evil; there is only power. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives