| 1 |
On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:22:22 +0300 |
| 2 |
Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On 04/16/2012 11:11 AM, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 5 |
> > On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:12:16 +0200 |
| 6 |
> > ""Paweł Hajdan, Jr.""<phajdan.jr@g.o> wrote: |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> >> On 4/10/12 8:58 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
| 9 |
> >>> Other option would be to enable "wxwidgets" by default for that |
| 10 |
> >>> profiles. |
| 11 |
> >> |
| 12 |
> >> I prefer this. Changing USE flag meaning in a counter-intuitive way |
| 13 |
> >> (to let "gtk" mean "wxwidgets") would seem frustrating to me. |
| 14 |
> >> |
| 15 |
> >> With "wxwidgets" enabled by default people will get the most likely |
| 16 |
> >> desired result (i.e. GUI) "out of the box", and setting |
| 17 |
> >> USE="-wxwidgets" will have desired effect. |
| 18 |
> >> |
| 19 |
> >> Note that with USE="gtk" really meaning USE="wxwidgets", -wxwidgets |
| 20 |
> >> would have no effect on such a package, which is the potentially |
| 21 |
> >> surprising behavior I mentioned earlier. |
| 22 |
> > |
| 23 |
> > On the other hand, we should ask ourselves whether the USE flags are |
| 24 |
> > very intuitive right now. |
| 25 |
> > |
| 26 |
> > Say, we have USE=ssl which enables SSL support. We already agreed |
| 27 |
> > that's the correct meaning of it, and USE=gnutls,openssl,nss are |
| 28 |
> > just to be used when there's more than one implementation to choose |
| 29 |
> > from. |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> USE=ssl is also meaning OpenSSL and there should be no USE=openssl |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
There could be one if an ebuild wishes to use non-openssl impl by |
| 34 |
default but allows user to force openssl. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
Best regards, |
| 38 |
Michał Górny |
Archives