Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Luke-Jr <luke-jr@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Cc: Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Patches and the 2.4->2.6 move
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 05:15:16
Message-Id: 200310200515.12906.luke-jr@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Patches and the 2.4->2.6 move by Donnie Berkholz
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On Monday 20 October 2003 04:59 am, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
5 > > First, why check /usr/src/linux? IMHO, that link may or may not always
6 > > be there or be correct. I recommend instead using the get_KV and
7 > > KV_to_int functions defined in /sbin/functions.sh to determine what the
8 > > machine is currently running.
9 >
10 > Because everything in Gentoo that needs a kernel should compile against
11 > /usr/src/linux. pcmcia-cs does so, xfree-drm does so, nvidia-kernel does
12 > so, ati-drivers does so ...
13 IIRC, get_KV etc all check /usr/src/linux. Using functions to get the version
14 would just make it easier if the policies on how to choose a kernel
15 changed...
16 - --
17 Luke-Jr
18 Developer, Gentoo Linux
19 http://www.gentoo.org/
20 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
21 Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
22
23 iD8DBQE/k29eZl/BHdU+lYMRAr3PAJ9VrDfY2EoPTI01ZWm+3n0gFekf4ACff4If
24 oAl+B/nOde0brzuzBzcamVQ=
25 =qI/M
26 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
27
28
29 --
30 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Patches and the 2.4->2.6 move Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o>