| 1 |
On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 08:20:03PM +0100, Chris Bainbridge wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Monday 23 August 2004 19:23, Ned Ludd wrote: |
| 3 |
> > > What about adding use="nptl" to make.defaults then? |
| 4 |
> > bad idea.. It's not well enough supported. Many bugs open that are not |
| 5 |
> > getting resolved. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> I could find 17 bugs with 'nptl' in the summary. Most of them are invalid; |
| 8 |
> mostly compile errors with old package versions that have since been fixed |
| 9 |
> upstream. #21132 looks like the only serious one, and that only affects |
| 10 |
> proprietary binary software. I've been running nptl for ages (on x86) and |
| 11 |
> have no problems with the other packages mentioned (openoffice, mysql, wine, |
| 12 |
> glibc). |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
bug #54603 concerning mono + NPTL is still very valid. Garbage |
| 16 |
collection is basically completely fscked when using an NPTL glibc. |
| 17 |
There definitely *are* still bugs related to NPTL. (well, at least one |
| 18 |
that i'm sure of) |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-pete |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> -- |
| 24 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Peter Johanson |
| 29 |
<latexer@g.o> |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives