Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Deprecation of python_version(), python_mod_exists(), python_tkinter_exists(), distutils_python_version() and distutils_python_tkinter() in EAPI <=2
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2010 11:14:01
Message-Id: 4B90E724.8040504@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Deprecation of python_version(), python_mod_exists(), python_tkinter_exists(), distutils_python_version() and distutils_python_tkinter() in EAPI <=2 by Peter Hjalmarsson
1 On 03/05/2010 11:54 AM, Peter Hjalmarsson wrote:
2
3 >
4 > I have start to question why should we care about overlays more then the
5 > actual portage tree?
6
7 My comments do not imply caring more about overlays than the actual
8 portage tree.
9
10 >
11 > Take for example the kernel or Xorg.
12 > They give themselves a period of time to clean up their own code (i.e.
13 > kernel-modules, xorg-drivers) and then they release it as stable and
14 > tell users/distributors to upgrade.
15 > They do not wait for nVidia/AMD/other out-of-tree drivers/modules to
16 > catch up.
17 >
18
19 This doesn't match the situation in question. This more closely matches
20 changing for example libX11 ABI.
21
22 > Now if we say we have someone managing an overlay, and this person do
23 > miss this warning/die for half an year, then I would say they have nott
24 > done their homework and they are on their own. I do not see why we
25 > should wait unreasonable long periods of time because there may be
26 > someone broken somewhere.
27 >
28
29 Because there is so little benefit from removing old functions. What is
30 so bad about having them grouped at the bottom of the file inside a
31 deprecated section?
32
33 Regards,
34 Petteri

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies