| 1 |
Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Tiziano Mller wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> Am Dienstag, 9. Oktober 2007 14.56:24 schrieb Doug Goldstein: |
| 6 |
>>> Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 7 |
>>>> On 22:01 Mon 08 Oct , Doug Goldstein (cardoe) wrote: |
| 8 |
>>>>> 1.1 sys-fs/evms/evms-2.5.5-r8.ebuild |
| 9 |
>>>>> |
| 10 |
>>>>> file : |
| 11 |
>>>>> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-fs/evms/evms-2.5.5-r |
| 12 |
>>>>> 8.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup plain: |
| 13 |
>>>>> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-fs/evms/evms-2.5.5-r |
| 14 |
>>>>> 8.ebuild?rev=1.1&content-type=text/plain |
| 15 |
>>>>> |
| 16 |
>>>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/md_super_fix.patch" |
| 17 |
>>>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/ntfs_unmkfs.patch" |
| 18 |
>>>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_degrade_fix_v2.patch" |
| 19 |
>>>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_remove_spare_fix.patch" |
| 20 |
>>>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_remove_spare_fix_2.patch" |
| 21 |
>>>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_algorithm.patch" |
| 22 |
>>>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/cli_reload_options.patch" |
| 23 |
>>>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/cli_query_segfault.patch" |
| 24 |
>>>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/get_geometry.patch" |
| 25 |
>>>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/BaseName.patch" |
| 26 |
>>>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/disk_cache.patch" |
| 27 |
>>>>> |
| 28 |
>>>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-as-needed.patch" |
| 29 |
>>>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-glib_dep.patch" |
| 30 |
>>>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-ocfs2.patch" |
| 31 |
>>>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-use_disk_group.patch" |
| 32 |
>>>>> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-pagesize.patch" |
| 33 |
>>>> |
| 34 |
>>>> This would be another good candidate for using epatch's bulk patching, |
| 35 |
>>>> particularly if you moved the last group of patches into the PV |
| 36 |
>>>> directory. |
| 37 |
>>> |
| 38 |
>>> dev-zero? |
| 39 |
>> Nope. The stuff in ${PV} are the patches upstream has on their servers, |
| 40 |
>> while the others are mostly Gentoo-specific or something else. So I want |
| 41 |
>> them to be separated. |
| 42 |
>> And I don't see any reason to start renaming now. |
| 43 |
> |
| 44 |
> Still no good reason not to just call epatch once: |
| 45 |
> |
| 46 |
> epatch \ |
| 47 |
> list \ |
| 48 |
> of \ |
| 49 |
> patches \ |
| 50 |
> here |
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
Go ahead if you have enough spare time to handle this cosmetic stuff because I |
| 53 |
don't. |
| 54 |
|
| 55 |
Cheers, |
| 56 |
Tiziano |
| 57 |
|
| 58 |
-- |
| 59 |
Tiziano Müller |
| 60 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |
| 61 |
Areas of responsibility: Samba, PostgreSQL, cpp, Python |
| 62 |
E-Mail : dev-zero@g.o |
| 63 |
GnuPG FP : F327 283A E769 2E36 18D5 4DE2 1B05 6A63 AE9C 1E30 |
Archives