| 1 |
Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> USE flags are for features _within_ packages, not for things you do _to_ |
| 4 |
> the package. Choosing a toolchain shouldn't be done with USE flags. |
| 5 |
> That's what gcc-config is for. You seem to be rejecting it out of hand |
| 6 |
> rather than considering an expansion of its functionality. For example, |
| 7 |
> it could read a file to switch compilers in a package-dependent way. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Yes, complitely agree. This way reqiure to make some changes to portage |
| 10 |
system. If someone want to implement it. But this way of course much |
| 11 |
better. Here I agree for 100%. |
| 12 |
I just use USE flags as some kind of quasi sollution for now. Without |
| 13 |
changing something in portage. Of course if it will be accepted, it is |
| 14 |
much better to implement it into more clean way. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Anton. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives