Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 news item for review: Radiant upgrade
Date: Sun, 06 May 2007 18:52:04
Message-Id: 20070506194223.3ff96c3b@snowflake
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 news item for review: Radiant upgrade by Dan Meltzer
1 On Sun, 6 May 2007 14:39:13 -0400
2 Dan Meltzer <hydrogen@×××××××××××××××××.com> wrote:
3 > No, its designed to save messages for users to read. It was
4 > implemented because important information scrolled off the screen in
5 > major updates. If a user chooses not to read warn level messages
6 > from elog then they are responsible for the breakage, why abuse news
7 > for it?
8
9 One of the reasons GLEP 42 was necessary was because users *don't* read
10 things delivered by other methods.
11
12 --
13 Ciaran McCreesh

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 news item for review: Radiant upgrade Dan Meltzer <hydrogen@×××××××××××××××××.com>