From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 news item for review: Radiant upgrade | ||
Date: | Sun, 06 May 2007 18:52:04 | ||
Message-Id: | 20070506194223.3ff96c3b@snowflake | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 news item for review: Radiant upgrade by Dan Meltzer |
1 | On Sun, 6 May 2007 14:39:13 -0400 |
2 | Dan Meltzer <hydrogen@×××××××××××××××××.com> wrote: |
3 | > No, its designed to save messages for users to read. It was |
4 | > implemented because important information scrolled off the screen in |
5 | > major updates. If a user chooses not to read warn level messages |
6 | > from elog then they are responsible for the breakage, why abuse news |
7 | > for it? |
8 | |
9 | One of the reasons GLEP 42 was necessary was because users *don't* read |
10 | things delivered by other methods. |
11 | |
12 | -- |
13 | Ciaran McCreesh |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 news item for review: Radiant upgrade | Dan Meltzer <hydrogen@×××××××××××××××××.com> |