| 1 |
On Fri, 2019-05-31 at 11:37 -0500, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 04:08:28PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Fri, 2019-05-31 at 09:02 -0500, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > I have one small nit-pick. |
| 5 |
> > > |
| 6 |
> > > Can we use sys-users and sys-groups for the category names for the user |
| 7 |
> > > and group packages? |
| 8 |
> > > |
| 9 |
> > > I guess the only argument I can give is users and groups are system |
| 10 |
> > > level things like other categories that start with sys-, so it feels |
| 11 |
> > > like a good fit to me. |
| 12 |
> > > |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > No. They would mix with regular packages which would be confusing. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> How are you defining a regular package? A regular package to me is a |
| 17 |
> package that installs something on the system. A virtual does not |
| 18 |
> install anything directly. |
| 19 |
> A user or group package does install a user or group, so it does install |
| 20 |
> something. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
They have very special purpose that is nothing like a regular package. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Best regards, |
| 27 |
Michał Górny |
Archives