Archives
Archives
| From: | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Eclass vs EAPI For Utility Functions (Patching/etc) | ||
| Date: | Thu, 19 Jun 2014 17:53:58 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAGfcS_kHZCJr8UBmkVS7_d6a_BFyVN1JwFZaUWFK2Cv08_p7UA@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Eclass vs EAPI For Utility Functions (Patching/etc) by William Hubbs |
||
| 1 | On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 1:03 PM, William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > Hi all: |
| 3 | > |
| 4 | > I am strongly in favor of the eapi-based approach as well, for all of |
| 5 | > the reasons mentioned in the thread so far. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Good thing your proxy got it right then! :) |
| 8 | |
| 9 | http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20140617-summary.txt |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Rich |