Archives
Archives
| From: | Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: toolchain-r1.eclass | ||
| Date: | Thu, 25 Jul 2013 16:37:26 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAEdQ38Gim1NaHhzrU=0wErhoyuAcPCq5BAYHsJZq+-Ua=h47Sg@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] RFC: toolchain-r1.eclass by "Paweł Hajdan | ||
| 1 | On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 9:26 AM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." |
| 2 | <phajdan.jr@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | > Then there is a question whether toolchain packages should use EAPI 5, |
| 4 | |
| 5 | EAPI=5 would be useful for both the mips team (for bug 477956) and for |
| 6 | catalyst builders (for subslot dependencies when dealing with binary |
| 7 | packages). |