Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Thomas Cort <linuxgeek@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Making the developer community more open
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 14:02:30
Message-Id: 3b09e8e90603220558s5ac1e6d8ya5b44dd0bcbea9e9@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: Making the developer community more open by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
1 > > A developer could then take these ebuilds, make sure they
2 > > don't do anything malicious, or break QA, or whatever, and act as the
3 > > bridge between the portage tree and the users actually working on the
4 > > ebuild and keeping things up to date and working.
5
6 > The easiest way to handle "contrib" as far as that "big warning" is to
7 > make it a separate tree. That way, folks who want the flexibility get
8 > it, but those who prefer not to "risk it", don't have to worry about it.
9 > As well, contribs becomes another fertile developer recruitment ground.
10
11 Why would the packages need a "big warning"/overlay/eclass if they
12 were checked by a developer to make sure they "don't do anything
13 malicious, or break QA, or whatever"? There are many user contributed
14 ebuilds that have made their way into portage after being reviewed by
15 devs that don't have any such warnings.
16
17 I don't think creating a "contrib" overlay as an official part of
18 Gentoo would be a good idea because making it an official Gentoo
19 project conveys a certain level of quality. If the quality is there,
20 then why not add the ebuilds to portage in the first place? If the
21 quality isn't there, then you will have a lot of unhappy users
22 complaining that an official Gentoo overlay broke their system.
23
24 Having a non-Gentoo sponsored contrib overlay wouldn't be a good idea
25 either IMO because the contributors wouldn't be contributing to
26 Gentoo, and they wouldn't be interacting as much with the Gentoo
27 developer community. Sure they would learn a lot of the skills
28 required to be a Gentoo developer, but they wouldn't be increasing the
29 value of anything in portage (unless they got a proxy to commit some
30 of their work to portage). Also, there are many overlays out there
31 already. Adding another one won't help with "making the developer
32 community more open". Additionally, I don't personally know of a lot
33 of people who actually use third party overlays except to get an
34 ebuild for a particular package they want or to beta test ebuilds.
35
36 -Thomas
37
38 --
39 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: Making the developer community more open Dan Meltzer <parallelgrapefruit@×××××.com>