| 1 |
On Sat, 2005-08-27 at 17:51 +0200, Maurice van der Pot wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 04:24:40PM +0200, Martin Schlemmer wrote: |
| 3 |
> > I still think a autoreconf is usually enough, except for cases where |
| 4 |
> > that do not work, |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> And what is "not work" in this case? |
| 7 |
> - fails with an error so it's impossible to miss as a dev, or |
| 8 |
> - fails to do things properly, causing subtle bugs that users will run into |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Some guy doing a half ass job on writing configure.{ac,in}, Makefile.am |
| 12 |
and whatever other helper scripts causing either autoreconf to fail, or |
| 13 |
errors during building. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Don't ask for an example .. I cannot recall now, but I have run into a |
| 16 |
few packages in the past. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Martin Schlemmer |
Archives