1 |
W dniu nie, 17.12.2017 o godzinie 13∶39 -0500, użytkownik Mike Gilbert |
2 |
napisał: |
3 |
> On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 8:21 AM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> > Hello, everyone. |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > It's my pleasure to announce that with a majority vote the QA team has |
7 |
> > accepted a new policy. The accepted wording is: |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > Total size of 'files' subdirectory of a package should not be larger |
10 |
> > than 32 KiB. If the package needs more auxiliary files, they should |
11 |
> > be put into SRC_URI e.g. via tarballs. |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > (the total size being computed as a sum of apparent file sizes) |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> > The relevant policy vote is finishing at bug #633758 [1]. The CI reports |
16 |
> > [2] were updated to report packages whose 'files' directories exceed |
17 |
> > 64 KiB, to avoid adding many new warnings at once. The limit will |
18 |
> > be lowered down to 32 KiB as packages are fixed to comply with the new |
19 |
> > policy. |
20 |
> > |
21 |
> > At the same time, I would like to explicitly remind developers that |
22 |
> > the spirit of the policy is 'do not let "files" grow large', not 'make |
23 |
> > sure you're one byte less than 32769.' Do not argue that your package |
24 |
> > exceeds the limit only by few bytes -- even if it gets close to the |
25 |
> > limit, then it means it's way too large. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> I just want to voice my opinion on this: as a developer, this policy |
28 |
> is a royal pain in the ass. |
29 |
|
30 |
Given that at the moment of the vote there was around 70 packages not |
31 |
meeting the limit, I dare believe it isn't such a big issue for any |
32 |
single developer. |
33 |
|
34 |
> I would ask the council to please increase this limit to at least 100 |
35 |
> KiB, preferably more. |
36 |
|
37 |
Let's give it a few days first, ok? Let's see how it works in practice |
38 |
and get more feedback. It'd be kinda silly to abolish it at the moment |
39 |
of introducing it. |
40 |
|
41 |
That said, without the 32 KiB directory size limit, the 20 KiB file size |
42 |
limit makes even less sense, so we should probably drop it. |
43 |
|
44 |
-- |
45 |
Best regards, |
46 |
Michał Górny |