| 1 |
On 07/18/04 Bryan Østergaard wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Hi all. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> fresco-base is missing from profiles/categories resulting in repoman |
| 6 |
> bailing out. I don't know why this is the case but it seems like it's |
| 7 |
> been removed from profiles/categories before.. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Here's the relevant entry from cvs log categories: |
| 10 |
> ---------------------------- |
| 11 |
> revision 1.19 |
| 12 |
> date: 2002/10/11 18:20:02; author: phoenix; state: Exp; lines: +0 |
| 13 |
> -1 Nonono, fresco should not be in the official tree yet. |
| 14 |
> ---------------------------- |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Anybody know of a valid reason not to add this category? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
First you'd have to look for a maintainer. Those ebuilds are quite old |
| 19 |
and are probably broken atm. Also I'm not completely sure if fresco |
| 20 |
itself is alive, the latest news entry is over a year old, but there |
| 21 |
seems to be some (not much) activity on the Wiki and in CVS. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
As it stands now I'd rather remove those packages from CVS than adding |
| 24 |
the category. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Marius |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be |
| 32 |
Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better. |
Archives