| 1 |
On 5/20/11 6:54 PM, Mike Pagano wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Friday 20 May 2011 04:58:12 Luca Barbato wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 5/17/11 6:57 PM, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 4 |
>> That shouldn't be read as endorsing the peculiar and conceptually broken |
| 5 |
>> init replacement called systemd. |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> lu |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Just curious, would you mind elaborating on it's peculiarities and conceptual brokenness? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Having sockets managed by init instead of your daemon doesn't work quite |
| 12 |
well. (see why xinetd isn't used in many real-life situations) |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
lu |
Archives