Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Peter Alfredsen <loki_val@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] profile shift for arm/s390/sh from "stable" to "dev"
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:43:27
Message-Id: 200806111843.13935.loki_val@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] profile shift for arm/s390/sh from "stable" to "dev" by Mike Frysinger
1 On Saturday 31 May 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote:
2 > On Saturday 31 May 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote:
3 > > ive made this shift in profiles.desc:
4 > > sed -ir '/^(arm|s390|sh)/s:stable:dev:' profiles.desc
5 > > if/when we get dedicated arch maintainers, they can think about
6 > > shifting back
7 >
8 > for the confused ... you should still be adding these arches for
9 > stable requests and you should not be dropping their keywords
10 > -mike
11
12 Just for the extra dense among us, does this mean that when a security
13 bug such as 216850[1] gets closed with no response from those arches,
14 that in such cases we are allowed punt the affected ebuild, even though
15 it will break your stable?
16
17 [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/216850
18
19 --
20 /PA

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: profile shift for arm/s390/sh from "stable" to "dev" Christian Faulhammer <opfer@g.o>