| 1 |
Olivier Crête wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 2005-18-04 at 14:30 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>>On Monday 18 April 2005 11:09 am, Marius Mauch wrote: |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>>>4Q-2002:move net-misc/atftp net-ftp/atftp |
| 7 |
>>>3Q-2003:move net-ftp/atftp net-misc/atftp |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>>personally i dont who thought putting atftp into net-misc from net-ftp was a |
| 10 |
>>good idea ... all ftp packages should be in net-ftp right ? |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>>if no one cares i'll move: |
| 13 |
>>atftp / linksys-tftp / netkit-tftp |
| 14 |
>>from net-misc to net-ftp where they belong |
| 15 |
>>-mike |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> It might be related to the fact that they are tftp programs... which is |
| 19 |
> different from ftp... |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
True, but tftp is one method of transferring a file. So in that regard, |
| 23 |
it, and others such as rsync IMHO still belong in net-ftp. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
+-------------------------------------------------------------+ |
| 27 |
| Stuart Longland -oOo- http://stuartl.longlandclan.hopto.org | |
| 28 |
| Atomic Linux Project -oOo- http://atomicl.berlios.de | |
| 29 |
| - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - | |
| 30 |
| I haven't lost my mind - it's backed up on a tape somewhere | |
| 31 |
+-------------------------------------------------------------+ |
Archives