Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ben de Groot <yngwin@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new "qt" category
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 14:39:22
Message-Id: CAB9SyzR8WT1py0uLK8tmV1YbE5wByJhSR+dvcGf9y+b6G0yMXg@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new "qt" category by "Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn"
1 On 17 January 2013 22:09, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
2 <chithanh@g.o> wrote:
3 > Ben de Groot schrieb:
4 >> This category is
5 >> to be used for the various modules and applications that belong to the
6 >> upstream Qt Framework only (these include e.g. assistant and
7 >> linguist). Third-party applications should remain in the current
8 >> categories.
9 >
10 > So where do modules go that come from upstream but are not part of Qt
11 > itself, if such packages exist or are going to exist? Did you entertain
12 > the idea of having qt-base (for qt-core, qt-gui, ...) and qt-extra (for
13 > qca, qwt, ...) categories? This would also address Diego's comment.
14
15 If they are not part of the Qt Framework as upstream defines it, then
16 they go into the respective categories, e.g. dev-util/qt-creator which
17 already exists.
18 --
19 Cheers,
20
21 Ben | yngwin
22 Gentoo developer
23 Gentoo Qt project lead, Gentoo Wiki admin