1 |
On Monday 09 May 2005 02:23 pm, Phil Richards wrote: |
2 |
> On 2005-05-09, Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> > On Monday 09 May 2005 08:35 am, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: |
4 |
> > > On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 23:41 -0400, Aaron Walker wrote: |
5 |
> > > > There are a sleu of C++-only libs in dev-libs that IMO belong in |
6 |
> > > > dev-cpp: |
7 |
> > > |
8 |
> > > dev-cpp sounds like stuff releated to a C pre-processor? Can't |
9 |
> > > categories contain the '+' char? e.g dev-c++? |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > we did relax the requirement on package names so they can contain '+' in |
12 |
> > them, but i think we should keep our unspoken anal rules about category |
13 |
> > names ... only alphanumeric and a single '-' |
14 |
> > -mike |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Might I suggest dev-cxx? CXX is a fairly common ASCIIfication of C++, |
17 |
> after all. |
18 |
|
19 |
maybe, but cpp is almost as common and not really worth the hassle of a |
20 |
category rename |
21 |
-mike |
22 |
-- |
23 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |