Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Christian Hergl <weehawk@×××××××.de>
To: gentoo-dev@××××××××××.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage killed. Any help?
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 01:47:03
Message-Id: 3BF3723F.4060506@weehawk.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage killed. Any help? by Karl Trygve Kalleberg
1 Oh,
2
3 erh, sorry, that should be acctually "MAINTAINER". Had to write the
4 whole message down and send it in a email from Windows. My bad =)
5
6 Though thanks for already looking,
7
8 Christian
9
10 Karl Trygve Kalleberg wrote:
11
12 > On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 09:39:44PM +0100, Christian Hergl wrote:
13 >
14 >
15 >>File "/usr/bin/emerge", line 301, in ?
16 >> if not portage.settings.has_key ("MAINTAINTER"):
17 >>
18 >
19 > I really don't like that error just above there. What is a MAINTAINTER
20 > anyway ? The primary 'tainter' of Gentoo ? Dan Armak, have you been checking
21 > in Win32 stuff again ??? ;p
22 >
23 > A bit more seriously, I will look into this once I have my laptop back up
24 > and running, unless drobbins beats me to it.
25 >
26 > Karl T
27 >
28 > _______________________________________________
29 > gentoo-dev mailing list
30 > gentoo-dev@××××××××××.org
31 > http://cvs.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev
32 >
33 >