Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Santiago M. Mola" <coldwind@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Reducing the size of the system package set
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 12:20:22
Message-Id: 3c32af40801080420o1fc856caga3187e74bbb843e6@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Reducing the size of the system package set by flameeyes@gmail.com (Diego 'Flameeyes' =?utf-8?Q?Petten=C3=B2?=)
1 On Jan 8, 2008 12:34 PM, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò <flameeyes@×××××.com> wrote:
2 >
3 > So my goals are:
4 > - have a deptree as complete as possible;
5
6 Your goals make sense but reducing the system package set seems like
7 workaround to get you indirectly where you want. Having a complete
8 deptree and having a small system package set should be independent
9 goals, maybe your proposal should focus on making possible to have a
10 deptree as complete as possible independently of what packages are on
11 system set.
12
13 Note that I'm not stating that we can't discuss about removing package
14 X or Y from system, but I think we should discuss that separately.
15
16 Regards,
17 Santiago
18
19 --
20 Santiago M. Mola
21 Jabber ID: cooldwind@×××××.com
22 éí¢‡^¾X¬¶ÈžÚ(¢¸&j)bž b²

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Reducing the size of the system package set flameeyes@gmail.com (Diego 'Flameeyes' =?utf-8?Q?Petten=C3=B2?=)