1 |
On Jan 8, 2008 12:34 PM, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò <flameeyes@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> So my goals are: |
4 |
> - have a deptree as complete as possible; |
5 |
|
6 |
Your goals make sense but reducing the system package set seems like |
7 |
workaround to get you indirectly where you want. Having a complete |
8 |
deptree and having a small system package set should be independent |
9 |
goals, maybe your proposal should focus on making possible to have a |
10 |
deptree as complete as possible independently of what packages are on |
11 |
system set. |
12 |
|
13 |
Note that I'm not stating that we can't discuss about removing package |
14 |
X or Y from system, but I think we should discuss that separately. |
15 |
|
16 |
Regards, |
17 |
Santiago |
18 |
|
19 |
-- |
20 |
Santiago M. Mola |
21 |
Jabber ID: cooldwind@×××××.com |
22 |
éí¢‡^¾X¬¶ÈžÚ(¢¸&j)bž b² |