| 1 |
On 3/24/06, Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Thoughts on ideas on this somewhat more focussed idea? ( or at least I |
| 3 |
> think it's more focused :P ) |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
IMO motivation b) is not taken into account enough. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
You are missing out a general-user-overlay, where the developer adding |
| 8 |
a user to the access list would be responsible for him. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
We really need a general user overlay for stuff that is abandoned in |
| 11 |
the treee (maintainer-needed@g.o) or stuff that has not even |
| 12 |
been added to the tree (maintainer-wanted@g.o). Those are |
| 13 |
ebuilds that no developer is interested in, so a general way for users |
| 14 |
needs to be present to be able to take care of those in a |
| 15 |
policy-based-overlay instead of bugzilla. Also the overlay will be |
| 16 |
easier to access and more bug-free as every person who is trusted by |
| 17 |
gentoo-devs can just fix bugs that come up without spamming every CC: |
| 18 |
on the list as it would be in bugzilla. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Regards, |
| 21 |
Stefan |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives