1 |
On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 21:55:15 +0100 |
2 |
Peter Stuge <peter@×××××.se> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> James Le Cuirot wrote: |
5 |
> > # James Le Cuirot <chewi@g.o> (26 Jan 2016) |
6 |
> > # No new release since 2008. Removal in 30 days. |
7 |
> > app-cdr/webcdwriter |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Is there a problem with it? I don't use it and have no interest in |
10 |
> this particular package but merely lack of release is not a valid |
11 |
> reason to remove the ebuild if everything else is all right. If it |
12 |
> isn't, then maybe that needs to be added to the lastrite comment? |
13 |
|
14 |
I must admit that I had to think twice about this one given its unusual |
15 |
nature. The overriding factor is that there is tons of dead Java |
16 |
software in the tree and we're struggling to even keep up with the live |
17 |
stuff. We're therefore trimming the fat down to a more manageable size. |
18 |
This package was brought to my attention because bugs had been assigned |
19 |
to the optical media herd, which has now been disbanded. There are only |
20 |
3 open bugs, none of them serious, but apart from the lack of releases, |
21 |
I considered several points: |
22 |
|
23 |
* It's presented as a Java web applet or web start application. |
24 |
Applets are all but outlawed these days. Web start isn't dead and |
25 |
you don't strictly need a browser to use it but this isn't exactly a |
26 |
popular way to launch applications. |
27 |
|
28 |
* I'd be very dubious of the security around something like this. Even |
29 |
actively maintained software has seen tons of security |
30 |
vulnerabilities lately, not least in the Java space. |
31 |
|
32 |
* Optical media is on the decline. My main development machine doesn't |
33 |
even have a burner any more so I can't easily test it. |
34 |
|
35 |
* It was designed around cdrecord, which has seen many new releases |
36 |
since then and may not be entirely compatible any more. The cdrkit |
37 |
fork (which I use) may also have similar issues. I'll admit this is |
38 |
purely speculation on my part. |
39 |
|
40 |
* It's fugly. ;) Seriously, no one like Java's Swing and even Oracle |
41 |
and co have put it on life support, fixing critical bugs only. |
42 |
|
43 |
* The ebuild doesn't look like much fun. The project uses autotools, |
44 |
which is rarely a good thing in Java land. |
45 |
|
46 |
* There may be cleaner ways to achieve the same goal. If it were me, |
47 |
I'd try ATA over Ethernet with regular burning software, though I'm |
48 |
not entirely sure it would work. |
49 |
|
50 |
Am I off the hook now? ;) |
51 |
|
52 |
-- |
53 |
James Le Cuirot (chewi) |
54 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |