| 1 |
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:36:43 -0400 "Nathan L. Adams" <nadams@××××.org> |
| 2 |
wrote: |
| 3 |
| But with everyone screaming 'not enough manpower' the number of devs |
| 4 |
| with commit access is just bound to increase. So why not focus on how |
| 5 |
| to increase quality by default? |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
I am doing. I'm doing it by trying to improve the documentation and the |
| 8 |
entry requirements for new developers. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
| > Problem is, getting decent |
| 11 |
| > QA done once things hit the tree is in many cases very difficult |
| 12 |
| |
| 13 |
| So why not build peer review into the process/policy? Require that the |
| 14 |
| team leads (who could deligate as they see fit) perform verification |
| 15 |
| (peer review) before closing out bugs. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Because that won't help in the slightest. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron) |
| 21 |
Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org |
| 22 |
Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm |
Archives