| 1 |
On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 04:03:25PM +0200, Maciej Mrozowski wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Friday 04 of September 2009 22:08:02 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Fri, 04 Sep 2009 22:04:46 +0200 |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > R?mi Cardona <remi@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> > > Having tools to manipulate those variables is very misleading since |
| 7 |
> > > users will (rightfully) assume that we've done our homework and that |
| 8 |
> > > upstream did too. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> > Why not use EAPI 4 to make sure people have done that homework then? |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Because it won't make *upstream* do their homework. |
| 13 |
> I suppose you volunteer to make this homework for Gentoo to fulfill new EAPI |
| 14 |
> requirements as I assume your lawyer skills equals the will to propose yet |
| 15 |
> another EAPI. |
| 16 |
> Therefore I fully support this idea. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> -- |
| 19 |
> regards |
| 20 |
> MM |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
What is your point? If your goal is to come across as a bitter person with a lot |
| 23 |
of hate then you've succeeded. Tone it down please as you're not contributing |
| 24 |
anything useful to the discussion like that. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Ciaran's really not making homework up for gentoo. Why, remi stated himself that |
| 27 |
we have homework to do(and we sometimes don't do that homework) so unless you're |
| 28 |
just trying to pick a fight I don't see what you're trying to say. Please don't |
| 29 |
do that. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Regards, |
| 33 |
Thomas |
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
--------- |
| 36 |
Thomas Anderson |
| 37 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 38 |
///////// |
| 39 |
Areas of responsibility: |
| 40 |
AMD64, Secretary to the Gentoo Council |
| 41 |
--------- |
Archives