1 |
Ciaran McCreesh posted <20040927225631.628b169a@××××××××.home>, excerpted |
2 |
below, on Mon, 27 Sep 2004 22:56:31 +0100: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 14:41:30 -0700 Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote: |
5 |
> | it shouldn't be installed, for security reasons. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> What security reasons would those be? |
8 |
|
9 |
Just the usual basic don't install what you don't need, and you have fewer |
10 |
things to worry about having exploitable holes in them, concept. (Didn't |
11 |
I read someone on this group/list claiming that Gentoo had a no |
12 |
unnecessary daemons policy, just yesterday?) |
13 |
|
14 |
I thought the "if it's not needed, it shouldn't be installed for security |
15 |
reasons" was clear enough. However, upon rereading, I guess it /could/ be |
16 |
taken that there was something more specific to worry about, tho I didn't |
17 |
say there was, from what I wrote. |
18 |
|
19 |
-- |
20 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
21 |
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little |
22 |
temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- |
23 |
Benjamin Franklin |
24 |
|
25 |
|
26 |
|
27 |
-- |
28 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |