| 1 |
Corey Shields wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Friday 18 November 2005 03:46 pm, Lance Albertson wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>>I'm very disappointed that the council did not wait on the vote for this |
| 5 |
>>considering the sudden submission of the revision of the GLEP. I'm |
| 6 |
>>curious the reasoning for going ahead with this? |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> So.. I'm hearing that the GLEP was submitted, then a day before the vote it |
| 10 |
> was revised.. Is that true? It should be voted on the way that it was |
| 11 |
> submitted. No riders. If it needs to be revised post-submission, then such |
| 12 |
> submission should be revoked. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
No, thats not entirely true. It was submitted a few months ago and taken |
| 15 |
to the council where it was rejected and asked to be revised. When the |
| 16 |
council asked for things to put on their agenda for this latest meeting, |
| 17 |
it was asked that this GLEP be voted upon again. At this point, the |
| 18 |
revised version had yet to be shown on -dev for discussion. It wasn't |
| 19 |
until a day before the vote that it was sent to -dev for discussion. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
I just wanted to get the facts straight :-) (at least from how I know). |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Lance Albertson <ramereth@g.o> |
| 25 |
Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
--- |
| 28 |
GPG Public Key: <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc> |
| 29 |
Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742 |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
ramereth/irc.freenode.net |
Archives