1 |
On Thu, 26 Sep 2013 21:14:11 +1000 |
2 |
Michael Palimaka <kensington@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> On 26/09/2013 20:55, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
4 |
> > On Thu, 26 Sep 2013 20:51:26 +1000 |
5 |
> > Michael Palimaka <kensington@g.o> wrote: |
6 |
> >> There isn't a 100% perfect solution currently, and I agree that |
7 |
> >> hurrying people will simply move us from "not enough rebuilds" to |
8 |
> >> "too many rebuilds". |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > This is still a huge improvement. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> At the same time, it's also a huge regression. |
13 |
|
14 |
It's only a regression if you think "occasional unnecessary recompiles" |
15 |
is a problem. And if you do think it's a problem, there are better |
16 |
things to change to "fix" it, such as allowing full recompiles to be |
17 |
avoided for minor changes to a package. |
18 |
|
19 |
-- |
20 |
Ciaran McCreesh |