| 1 |
On Sun, Oct 07, 2001 at 10:15:08AM -0600, Daniel Robbins wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, Oct 07, 2001 at 04:05:25PM +0200, Erik Van Reeth wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> > Just a question : can one use the preemptive kernel patch and the low latency |
| 5 |
> > patch of Andrew Morton together or is the preemptive better than the other |
| 6 |
> > one. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> They should work together. I just applied the scheduling latency patch to my |
| 9 |
> preemptive 2.4.10 sources, and I got no rejects. They should complement each |
| 10 |
> other, if I understand it correctly. However, I haven't tested the kernel yet, |
| 11 |
> but I will this afternoon. If they work together, this will be one hot kernel. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
The low latency patches and the preempt patches work great together. I'll roll |
| 14 |
these into 2.4.10-r2 and have it on rsync within minutes (I hope :). |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Best Regards, |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Daniel Robbins <drobbins@g.o> |
| 20 |
Chief Architect/President http://www.gentoo.org |
| 21 |
Gentoo Technologies, Inc. |
Archives