| 1 |
On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 16:23 +0300, Mart Raudsepp wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> I'd be happy if some other unpacker is used than lzma-utils - one that |
| 4 |
> does not depend on libstdc++ - I'm sure it can be done, heck it's done |
| 5 |
> in integrated form in some other projects in less than a couple |
| 6 |
> kilobytes of code for the unpacking from a VFS. Meanwhile please |
| 7 |
> consider using the upstream provided .tar.gz tarballs instead and not |
| 8 |
> roll patchsets in .lzma just cause you can. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
busybox has unlzma and seems to be a part of "system". |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Should also be easy to create a really tiny unlzma from the busybox |
| 13 |
source and ship with portage, or create a patch for tar or something. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-nc |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives