Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Travis Tilley <lv@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: Jason Stubbs <jstubbs@g.o>, gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Reliance on undocumented behaviour [WAS: Arches marking ebuilds stable before maintainer]
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 18:47:28
Message-Id: 200406211050.19802.lv@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Reliance on undocumented behaviour [WAS: Arches marking ebuilds stable before maintainer] by Jason Stubbs
1 On Monday 21 June 2004 08:03 am, Jason Stubbs wrote:
2 > Adding 'sys-devel/gcc -*' to package.keywords is *INCORRECT*. This is
3 > undocumented (and IMO broken) behaviour that cannot be relied upon. As
4 > foser said, "-* means broken on all arches by definition." Instead you
5 > should be encouraging the testers (and yourself) to copy the ebuild to your
6 > overlay and editing the KEYWORDS.
7
8 i should be encouraging users to copy over an ebuild that was being changed
9 often? changed as in fixed? with revision bumps made to force people to
10 recompile? that's a nightmare waiting to happen. i actually have control over
11 an ebuild in the tree, i dont have control over an overlay... i like being
12 able to fix bugs thanks.
13
14 is there a better solution than an overlay that doesnt depend on undocumented
15 behavior then?
16
17
18 --
19
20 Travis Tilley <lv@g.o>
21
22 --
23 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies