| 1 |
On 10/05/2010 10:20 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> as-needed fixes nothing. It works around some things, and introduces |
| 3 |
> some fairly icky problems as consequences. See the deleted comments on |
| 4 |
> Diego's blog posts for details. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
We discussed that to death, you are wrong abusing overlinking in your |
| 7 |
pet project and what you were asking for is exactly the as-needed behaviour. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
>> the problem is that libtool mangles also library search paths when |
| 10 |
>> using .la files and that breaks in a number of situations we have in |
| 11 |
>> some sort of normal uses of Gentoo. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> Ah, so you'll be giving us a patch to test for that too, right? Fixing |
| 14 |
> the actual problem, rather than adding workarounds to a thousand or so |
| 15 |
> packages... |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Apparently you do not know how libtool works or you are deliberately |
| 18 |
ignoring it... The patch is stupid (see below) but then you'd have to |
| 19 |
run libtoolize on every package you want to fix. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
@@ -5936,7 +5936,7 @@ |
| 22 |
searchdirs="$newlib_search_path $lib_search_path |
| 23 |
$sys_lib_search_path $shlib_search_path" |
| 24 |
fi |
| 25 |
for searchdir in $searchdirs; do |
| 26 |
- for search_ext in .la $std_shrext .so .a; do |
| 27 |
+ for search_ext in $std_shrext .so .a .la; do |
| 28 |
# Search the libtool library |
| 29 |
lib="$searchdir/lib${name}${search_ext}" |
| 30 |
if test -f "$lib"; then |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
lu |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
Luca Barbato |
| 39 |
Gentoo/linux |
| 40 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero |
Archives