| 1 |
On 2021-12-09 15:04, Michał Górny wrote:
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Why do you need to use random name in the first place? We have full |
| 4 |
> control over T, so why not just hardcode a good name? |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Having discussed the matter with eclass maintainers on IRC, they are not
|
| 7 |
entirely sure whether using a static name in this context is entirely
|
| 8 |
safe. There were also concerns about making this change too aggressive
|
| 9 |
given it affects all supported EAPIs. Therefore, we have decided to play
|
| 10 |
it safe and stick as closely to old behaviour as possible, at least for now.
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Anyway, merged a moment ago.
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
--
|
| 15 |
Marecki |
Archives