| 1 |
25.12.2005, 4:17:05, Bret Towe wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On 12/24/05, Carsten Lohrke <carlo@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
>> This isn't politics, but copyright infringement on top of a ridiculous license |
| 5 |
>> (when you want to see it as one) we had a short discussion1 about several |
| 6 |
>> months ago. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> im sorry i fail to see how copyright infringement or a ridiculous licence |
| 9 |
> matters when commiting a ebuild to portage just pick a licence if thats the |
| 10 |
> issue warn the user and leave it at that |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Yuck. I'm sorry, but arguments like "copyright does not matter, just go ship |
| 13 |
it" won't fare too well, leaving further debate pretty much pointless. |
| 14 |
Copyright *does* matter, if you want to see an example how a ridiculous |
| 15 |
license kills the job, go see qmail ebuilds. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Best regards, |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Jakub Moc |
| 22 |
mailto:jakub@g.o |
| 23 |
GPG signature: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E |
| 24 |
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
... still no signature ;) |
Archives