| 1 |
On Sun, 2006-07-30 at 22:28 -0400, Dan Meltzer wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> I do not see why it is considdered hard for users to "get involved". |
| 4 |
> Users have at least two choices that I can think of right now, and |
| 5 |
> probably a number that I cannot think of. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
What's wrong with adding a third? Furthermore, a third where users can |
| 8 |
actually get their hands dirty, and one which encourages more eyeballs |
| 9 |
on the "code"? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I mean seriously, this whole discussion has gotten out of hand. People |
| 12 |
actually quit over this issue, which is pretty unfathomable to me. We |
| 13 |
have yet to actually *see* these alleged QA issues that people are |
| 14 |
clamouring over each other to escape from -- and sunrise has been about |
| 15 |
for a while already. Surely the nightmare would have started by now? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
What, honestly, are people worried about with Sunrise? Point me to some |
| 18 |
actual factual stuff that is verifiable. Not ad hominem or any sort of |
| 19 |
emotional crap -- just the facts, please. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Thanks, |
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Seemant Kulleen <seemant@g.o> |
| 24 |
Gentoo Foundation / Gentoo Linux |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives