| 1 |
On Saturday 16 May 2009 10:27:51 Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote: |
| 2 |
> How is it possible to do these things encoded in the filename? |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
For the export example, it's just a matter of using a different bash syntax |
| 5 |
from what the magic regex expects, which is completely irrelevant if it goes |
| 6 |
in the filename instead. For the versionator one, you would change the |
| 7 |
extension at the same time that you changed the version, removing the need to |
| 8 |
modify the file contents. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
But the point isn't that we want to be able to do those things. The point is |
| 11 |
that if the EAPI is in the filename, it's blatantly obvious that it has to be |
| 12 |
static, but adding strange and unintuitive restrictions on which shell |
| 13 |
constructs can be used is, well, strange and unintuitive. |
Archives