1 |
On Sat, 18 May 2002 16:05, andrew fabbro wrote: |
2 |
> - I disagree with your approach to /etc/shells, /etc/passwd, and |
3 |
> /etc/group. It seems like you pre-create every possible pseudo-user/group |
4 |
> and shell that might ever be needed. I'm never going to run qmail, and I |
5 |
> don't need a bunch of qmail accounts. If I did run qmail, I wouldn't need |
6 |
> all those postfix-related accounts ;) I think an installer should warn the |
7 |
> user about adding a group, or add it automatically (there's a longer debate |
8 |
> in there), but trying to foresee every possible package and adding users |
9 |
> really goes against the "you build it from scratch" philosophy (IMO). |
10 |
|
11 |
I second this, its getting harder to merge these files. If it werent for the |
12 |
fact that I "need" the new accounts (in case I ever want these programs) I |
13 |
could always keep my current files, with all the users Ive already added. It |
14 |
would be trivial for ebuilds to run useradd instead. |
15 |
|
16 |
-- |
17 |
Luke |