| 1 |
On 09/18/2015 01:24 PM, konsolebox wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:38 PM, Matthew Thode |
| 3 |
> <prometheanfire@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
>> Are you stating this is for package epochs? |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> I'm sorry but I'm not familiar with the term. If you mean package |
| 7 |
> versions, yes. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> The current specification I also mentioned is this: |
| 10 |
> https://projects.gentoo.org/pms/5/pms.html#x1-280003.2 |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Nah, I'm talking about epochs. When a package wishes to reversion |
| 14 |
itself, changing how it does versioning. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
For instance, nova is going to go from 2015.1.1 to 12.0.0, so 2015.n.x |
| 17 |
is epoch 1, and 12.y.z is epoch 2. Think of it like super versioning. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
http://legacy.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0440/#version-epochs has a nice |
| 20 |
summary. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
-- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire) |
Archives