| 1 |
On Mar 24, 2013 8:25 PM, "Matt Turner" <mattst88@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> |
| 4 |
wrote: |
| 5 |
> > And what if it breaks again in the future? Should we go over the same |
| 6 |
> > discussion again? |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Can't this be restated as "Shouldn't we tree clean it now since it |
| 9 |
> could have bugs in the future?"? Tree cleaning packages over future |
| 10 |
> hypothetical bugs seems like bad policy. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Sure but I haven't seen anyone stepping up and fix the existing problems |
| 14 |
either.... |
Archives