| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Stuart Herbert wrote: |
| 5 |
| Don't you think that maybe you're trying to bash square pegs into |
| 6 |
| round holes just for the sake of some sort of order that perhaps |
| 7 |
| doesn't actually benefit anyone at all? |
| 8 |
| |
| 9 |
| Where did the requirement that a herd has to be part of a larger |
| 10 |
| project come from? GLEP 39's crystal clear that we don't need a |
| 11 |
| project to cover every peice of work that Gentoo devs do. Herds |
| 12 |
| aren't even mentioned in there :) |
| 13 |
| |
| 14 |
| Why not just let herds carry on creating entries under /proj/en/? If |
| 15 |
| they're part of a larger project, that project can just link to the |
| 16 |
| herd's page. Our directory structure doesn't have to reflect a |
| 17 |
| biological classification tree :) |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
I think having some sort of hierarchical structure does benefit people. |
| 20 |
Not in the least because the "leads" can take care of any bureaucracy or |
| 21 |
red tape that may come up to affect anybody in their project. Having a |
| 22 |
person like this for a number of herds rather than a single herd just |
| 23 |
seems like an intuitively good idea to me. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Thanks, |
| 26 |
Donnie |
| 27 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 28 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
iD8DBQFDxK1CXVaO67S1rtsRAmN7AJ43jB+CAm4SifWonJ22TL5yD0C2mACfZ8Za |
| 31 |
6ZEJB2pLW4H4S3QUtyAJ0Rs= |
| 32 |
=m8JK |
| 33 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives