| 1 |
On Sat, 24 Oct 2015 15:55:58 +0000 (UTC) |
| 2 |
"Sergey Popov" <pinkbyte@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> commit: 169b6e23ed1fe39812deef35fc9f3002aa5ff9e3 |
| 5 |
> Author: Sergey Popov <pinkbyte <AT> gentoo <DOT> org> |
| 6 |
> AuthorDate: Sat Oct 24 15:55:42 2015 +0000 |
| 7 |
> Commit: Sergey Popov <pinkbyte <AT> gentoo <DOT> org> |
| 8 |
> CommitDate: Sat Oct 24 15:55:42 2015 +0000 |
| 9 |
> URL: https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=169b6e23 |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> net-mail/dovecot: drop old vulnerable versions |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Gentoo-Bug: 509954 |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Package-Manager: portage-2.2.20 |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> net-mail/dovecot/Manifest | 2 - |
| 18 |
> net-mail/dovecot/dovecot-2.2.9.ebuild | 278 ---------------------------------- |
| 19 |
> 2 files changed, 280 deletions(-) |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> [...] |
| 22 |
> -KEYWORDS="alpha amd64 arm hppa ia64 ~mips ppc ppc64 ~s390 ~sh sparc x86" |
| 23 |
> [...] |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
This effectively left stable sparc without a single version of dovecot. |
| 26 |
As a result, postfix deps are no longer satisfied on stable sparc |
| 27 |
either: |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/2d7675e/5.html#l2619 |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
I'd really appreciate if someone figured out how to fix this without |
| 32 |
reintroducing vulnerable versions. Or leaving sparc without dovecot |
| 33 |
and postfix. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
Best regards, |
| 37 |
Michał Górny |
| 38 |
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/> |
Archives