Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Sebastian Pipping <webmaster@××××××××.org>
To: Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Cc: treecleaner@g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo stats server/client @ 2009-08-22
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 22:55:09
Message-Id: 4A8F25CA.1000802@hartwork.org
1 Hello!
2
3
4 Arrivals
5 ========
6 The third peport table on installed packages "most-unmasked" has just
7 arrived:
8
9 http://smolt.hartwork.org:45678/static/stats/gentoo.html#installed_packages_most_unmasked
10
11
12 Questions
13 =========
14 Before adding the forth "least-installed" table, I'd like to take the
15 chance to ask for input from the treecleaner team, as it may be of most
16 interest to you in the future.
17
18 - Do you need anything that a dumb linear-with-counter approach
19 cannot offer?
20
21 - Would zero-install packages be more interesting than
22 almost-zero ones or the other way around?
23
24
25 What's next
26 ===========
27 Besides before-mentioned table the task
28
29 Collect FEATURES variables in three sets (conf, defaults, globals),
30 not merged
31 http://soc.gentooexperimental.org/issues/show/58
32
33 is next on my list.
34
35
36
37 Sebastian

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo stats server/client @ 2009-08-22 Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.de>
[gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo stats server/client @ 2009-08-22 Jeremy Olexa <darkside@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo stats server/client @ 2009-08-22 Sebastian Pipping <webmaster@××××××××.org>
[gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo stats server/client @ 2009-08-22 Torsten Veller <ml-en@××××××.net>