1 |
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 19:12 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: |
2 |
> On Tuesday 27 September 2005 18:38, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: |
3 |
> > On Tuesday 27 September 2005 11:23, Jason Stubbs wrote: |
4 |
> > > So what needs to be done to fix it? Well, what is the purpose of |
5 |
> > > USE_EXPAND? Put simply, it is to allow the user to select one or more |
6 |
> > > features of a package from a list of choices. How is this different to |
7 |
> > > USE flags? The choices all pertain to one aspect of the package(s). |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > The way ELIBC, KERNEL, USERLAND are used, is instead something different. |
10 |
> > They don't allow users to select what they want, they allow profiles to |
11 |
> > declare what they are created for. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Which leads me to the one thing I didn't say but feel strongest about.. What |
14 |
> is the real point of USE_EXPAND? What can/does it do that USE flags do not? |
15 |
|
16 |
As far as I can tell, it was created to keep people from adding a huge |
17 |
number of USE flags to IUSE on a package. I can't see any other reason |
18 |
for it. |
19 |
|
20 |
-- |
21 |
Chris Gianelloni |
22 |
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead |
23 |
Games - Developer |
24 |
Gentoo Linux |