Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Dirt: To shove under the rug or not shove under the rug? (aka another round of USE_EXPAND)
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 12:44:49
Message-Id: 1127824698.31328.14.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Dirt: To shove under the rug or not shove under the rug? (aka another round of USE_EXPAND) by Jason Stubbs
1 On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 19:12 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
2 > On Tuesday 27 September 2005 18:38, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
3 > > On Tuesday 27 September 2005 11:23, Jason Stubbs wrote:
4 > > > So what needs to be done to fix it? Well, what is the purpose of
5 > > > USE_EXPAND? Put simply, it is to allow the user to select one or more
6 > > > features of a package from a list of choices. How is this different to
7 > > > USE flags? The choices all pertain to one aspect of the package(s).
8 > >
9 > > The way ELIBC, KERNEL, USERLAND are used, is instead something different.
10 > > They don't allow users to select what they want, they allow profiles to
11 > > declare what they are created for.
12 >
13 > Which leads me to the one thing I didn't say but feel strongest about.. What
14 > is the real point of USE_EXPAND? What can/does it do that USE flags do not?
15
16 As far as I can tell, it was created to keep people from adding a huge
17 number of USE flags to IUSE on a package. I can't see any other reason
18 for it.
19
20 --
21 Chris Gianelloni
22 Release Engineering - Strategic Lead
23 Games - Developer
24 Gentoo Linux

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies