| 1 |
On 11/16/19 8:55 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> This is in the context of revision bumps, not version bumps. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
The things allowed in a revision bump are, |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
* New EAPI, |
| 8 |
* Adding/dropping eclasses, |
| 9 |
* Adding/dropping dependencies, |
| 10 |
* Adding/dropping a phase function, |
| 11 |
* Literally anything, except changing SRC_URI to a new version. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Everything that can go wrong in a new version can go wrong in a new |
| 14 |
revision, and almost none of them should go straight to stable. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> Also, the item immediately preceding it clarifies that any |
| 18 |
> non-trivial changes require dropping to ~arch. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I don't think it reads that way. The bullet list consists of |
| 21 |
not-mutually-exclusive items, and it's not clear if the items are to be |
| 22 |
"and"ed or "or"ed in the first place. |
Archives