| 1 |
Jason Wever <weeve@g.o> said: |
| 2 |
> Not to redirect the thread, but can someone point me to stuff on |
| 3 |
> executable stacks (what they are and the background info on the |
| 4 |
> warnings in portage)? |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Not really redirecting the thread since this was another thing I wanted to |
| 7 |
find out about :) Basically, any of the things that "stricter" may complain |
| 8 |
about, which are "critical", in the sense that they can not be marked stable |
| 9 |
under any circumstances? Also, what exactly do they mean? :) |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> If these are anywhere near critical, then I think a lot of us non-x86 |
| 12 |
> arch monkeys have a lot of work on our hands. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Yea, we need to know what is absolutely critical so we can add this to the |
| 15 |
ebuild policy if something should not go stable if the problem is present. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Mark Loeser - Gentoo Developer (cpp gcc-porting toolchain x86) |
| 19 |
email - halcy0n AT gentoo DOT org |
| 20 |
mark AT halcy0n DOT com |
| 21 |
web - http://dev.gentoo.org/~halcy0n/ |
| 22 |
http://www.halcy0n.com |
Archives