| 1 |
On Monday 12 of November 2007 13:26:46 Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote: |
| 2 |
> What exactly is the difference between this valid situation and the |
| 3 |
> previous invalid one? |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
between | | are things that can be done in parallel. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
invalid: |
| 8 |
a_pkg_setup b_pkg_setup a_build b_build | a_merge | b_merge |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
valid: |
| 11 |
a_pkg_setup b_pkg_setup a_build_binary b_build_binary | a_binary_pkg_setup | |
| 12 |
a_binary_merge | b_binary_pkg_setup | b_binary_merge |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Note that pkg_setup is run twice for the second case, so when the merge order |
| 15 |
is a then b, b_pkg_setup is aware of the changes that a_merge did, which is |
| 16 |
not the case in first situation. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Best Regards, |
| 20 |
Piotr Jaroszyński |
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives