| 1 |
>>>>> On Tue, 20 Jul 2021, Sam James wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> -Revision: 1 |
| 4 |
> +Revision: 2 |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Is this supposed to be read again by users? Then it should be a new news |
| 7 |
item (with updated date in filename) and the old item should be deleted. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> +Please note that if you last changed your password before ~2008, |
| 10 |
> +it may using md5crypt or similar other weak mechanisms in /etc/shadow; |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
This should be "may be using" or "may use" I think. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
s/similar other/similar/ |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> +a bug in PAM [0][1] may mean that you were unable to login. We recommend |
| 17 |
> +using `passwd` to change/refresh your passwrd so it is using modern |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
s/passwrd/password/ |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Also, this is read as plain text, so maybe use double quotes instead of |
| 22 |
accents graves. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
> +methods. A new version of PAM has been added to the tree to resolve this issue. |
Archives