| 1 |
On Sunday 20 November 2005 08:46, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 06:23:41PM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: |
| 3 |
> > B) What should be done with the @(subdomain_to_be_determined) email after |
| 4 |
> > an AT becomes a full dev (and presumably gets a @gentoo.org address)? For |
| 5 |
> > how long? |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> this is in the GLEP ... it clearly states that it will become a forward |
| 8 |
> to their new @gentoo.org address. the implied part is that when the |
| 9 |
> user feels they no longer need it, they punt it. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Missed it. Was skimming too quickly. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> > E) What criteria must an AT meet to be able to receive the shortened |
| 14 |
> > probationary when moving on to becoming a full dev? |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> they express interest in becoming a full dev at which point they enter |
| 17 |
> the normal 'becoming a dev' recruitment track. why should they have to |
| 18 |
> do something special to become a normal dev ? all devs are allowed to |
| 19 |
> be AT's. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
"the mentoring period should be shortened to a minimum of two weeks" was what |
| 22 |
I was referring to. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
> > G) What criteria must be met during the inital 30 day mentoring period? |
| 25 |
> > H) What criteria are there for maintaining one's status as an AT? |
| 26 |
> > I) What input does DevRel have in the process of becoming an AT? |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/amd64/tests/index.xml |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Err.. what's that got to do with the GLEP? |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
But none of this really matters apparently because the GLEP has been approved |
| 33 |
and I'm just one of the "people that don't have an opinion on the subject but |
| 34 |
were watching the council for its first bad step to be able to accuse it of |
| 35 |
abuse of power or worse". |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
Jason Stubbs |
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives