| 1 |
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 03/19/2012 11:00 PM, David Leverton wrote: |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> On 19 March 2012 06:05, Samuli Suominen<ssuominen@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
>>> |
| 6 |
>>> dev-cpp/cppserv would need working dev-cpp/sptk and we have none: |
| 7 |
>>> |
| 8 |
>>> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=402149#c9 |
| 9 |
>>> |
| 10 |
>>> the only working versions got marked as "obsolete" by upstream due to |
| 11 |
>>> "undisclosed reasons" whatever that means |
| 12 |
>>> |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
>> Not that I personally care, but it seems like this could be "solved" |
| 15 |
>> by just removing fltk support, rather than nuking it completely. |
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> don't think we should be "clinging on" the unmaintained packages that badly |
| 19 |
> from general overview of the sptk homepage, the whole point of the package |
| 20 |
> seems to be around fltk (and thus, X) |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> and from broader view... sometimes it seems the politics around package |
| 23 |
> removal has become a burden, rather than a tool |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
What politics? |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-A |
Archives